I can believe it been so long.



I used to write an annual column recommending a few stocks from the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Nasdaq is an interesting arena for stock pickers because it is home to many smaller companies, and also to such technology giants as Microsoft and Cisco.



While it lasted (20012006), this series of recommendations was going well. My Nasdaq picks gained an average of 20.6 percent in the year after publication, including reinvested dividends.



By comparison, the Nasdaq Composite Index averaged 11.1 percent during those six, oneyear periods. And the Standard Poor 500 Index averaged 9.3 percent.



My recommendations beat ugg australia outlet the Nasdaq Composite five times out of six and the S 500 four times out of six.



Bear in mind that the performance of my column recommendations is hypothetical and ignores trading costs and taxes. It should never be confused with the performance of portfolios I manage for clients. And past performance doesn predict results.



Another caveat: I am unable to find historical prices for one of the stocks I recommended in 2002, and for two of my picks in 2003. However, I believe the results would have been at least as good had these three stocks been included.



Let see if I can do as well going forward. Here are six Nasdaq stocks ugg boots outlet coupons I like for the coming 12 months.



Select Comfort Corp. (SCSS), of Plymouth, Minn., makes mattresses containing air chambers, allowing users to adjust the firmness to their liking. Earnings have grown at a 16 percent clip the past five years.



Select shares have dropped to about $18 from about $33 since September, based mainly on management comments that sales have slowed lately. In life and in investing, I pay more attention to what people (or companies) have done than to what they say they are going to do.



The risk for value investors like me, as canny investor Jim Rogers put it, is that we may overuse the rearview mirror and barely look out the windshield.



Nevertheless, I like Select Comfort at its current multiples, 13 times earnings and 1.1 times revenue. I believe the company has a good product that will continue to sell. It also is debtfree.



I always been fond of National Beverage Corp., partly because of its stock symbol, FIZZ. It makes that Shasta soda you had at the last churchbasement party you went to, and also offers several other brands of drinks, including Big Shot, Faygo, Ritz and St. Nicks.



The stock is virtually ignored on Wall Street, even though the company has more than $600 million in annual sales. Like Select Comfort, it is debtfree and has a 16 percent earnings growth rate for the past five years.



Third, I recommend Remy International Inc. (REMY) of Pendleton, Ind., which makes alternators, starters and hybrid motors. It is a small company (2012 sales of $1.1 billion) and a very cheap stock, selling at only four times earnings.



I believe autoparts makers are timely. roads is now 11 years old, a record. Demand for replacement parts and new cars should be strong.



Fourth, I like Deckers Outdoor Corp., the maker of Ugg boots, a stock I own personally and for almost all of my clients. The company is debtfree, and it has increased its earnings at a 17 percent annual clip the past five years. Investors have become skeptical that Deckers can continue such growth. Maybe they right, but I think 10 percent is realistic, and at that rate, I believe the stock would do well.



For investors who don have a moral problem with firearms, I like Smith Wesson Holding Corp. (SWHC), a leading maker of both handguns and rifles. I am in favor of stricter gun control laws, but I don believe my view will prevail. Smith Wesson is highly profitable: It had an astonishing 44 percent return on stockholders equity last fiscal year.



Lastly, I think American Public Education Inc. (APEI) looks good. The stock has been nearly stagnant since its 2007 initial offering, but earnings have increased substantially " at a 25 percent pace the past five years.



We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.



While most comments will be posted if they are ontopic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.



We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.



We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.



We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.



We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.



We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via email. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.